1993-04-22                     Senate Journal                      Page 1671
SB 60                                                                        
Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent for the adoption              
of amendment to Amendment No. 2.  Without objection, amendment                 
to Amendment No. 2 was adopted.                                                
                                                                               
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 2, as amended be                     
adopted?"  The roll was taken with the following result:                       
                                                                               
CSSB 60(FIN)                                                                   
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 2 as am                                                          
                                                                               
YEAS:  0   NAYS:  20   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                              
                                                                               
Nays:  Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly,             
Kerttula, Leman, Lincoln, Little, Miller, Pearce, Phillips,                    
Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff                                           
                                                                               
Salo changed from "Yea" to "Nay".                                              
                                                                               
and so, Amendment No. 2, as amended failed.                                    
                                                                               
Senator Duncan lifted the call.                                                
                                                                               
Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that CS FOR                   
SENATE BILL NO. 60(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to                   
third reading and placed on final passage.  Senator Adams objected.            
                                                                               
The question being: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 60(FIN) be                   
advanced to third reading?"  The roll was taken with the following             
result:                                                                        
                                                                               
CSSB 60(FIN)                                                                   
Advance from Second to Third Reading?                                          
                                                                               
YEAS:  11   NAYS:  9   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                              
                                                                               
                                                                               

1993-04-22                     Senate Journal                      Page 1672
SB 60                                                                        
Yeas:  Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips,          
Rieger, Sharp, Taylor                                                          
                                                                               
Nays:  Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo,          
Zharoff                                                                        
                                                                               
and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 60(FIN) failed to be advanced                   
to third reading.